Relatives' Distress Over Shoreline Erosion Endangering Norfolk Graves
Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.
A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards
The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.
“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
Searching for Solutions and Certainty
An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.
Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”
It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”
The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.